Universal Mail-In Voting is Goal of Nancy Pelosi & Mainstream Media

Universal Mail-In Voting is Goal of Nancy Pelosi & Mainstream Media

OPINION |This article contains political commentary which reflects the author’s opinion.

As Nancy Pelosi, the Democrat party and Mainstream Media continue to advance their efforts to implement Universal Mail-In Voting in all states, Americans need to recognize the serious implications in doing so. In my previous post, Would Mail-In Voting Lead to a Constitutional Crisis? you can watch as Mark R. Levine, (an expert in constitutional law) presents data that outlines why mail-in voting could lead to a legal nightmare in November. That episode continues below with Levin interviewing Hans von Spakovsky, (an expert in election law). Watching this excerpt could be the most important 6 1/2 minutes you’ve spent this week. It’s both eye opening and a little frightening to watch and listen to.

2020 Election & Universal Mail-In Voting

Source: “Life, Liberty & Levine” on Fox News Network August 23, 2020

Mark Levin’s first question to Hans was:

All this debate, the Democrats are setting this up. If we only had another three and a half billion dollars for the postal office, we could fix this. Twenty-five billion dollars overall and I’m saying you can give them a hundred billion dollars and that’s not going to fix a damn thing. What are you saying?”

4 Key Remarks from Hans von Spakovsky’s Reply:

  1. The postal service has been losing money for years because it’s poorly managed and organized.
  2. Any reforms to modernize the USPS and make it efficient have been opposed by the unions that represent the employees of the postal service.
  3. Throwing money at the problem is not going to solve the organizational and management problems.
  4. The mail delays in absentee ballots, the mis-delivery of ballots, the failing to put postmarks on the envelopes of absentee ballots are problems that have been going on for years.

Mark Levin’s 5 Key Points:

  1. Additional money to the USPS will not fix state election law problems.
  2. Joe Biden has 600 lawyers who are prepared to litigate the 2020 election results.
  3. Pelosi, the Democrat party and mainstream media are trying to position this as a Trump failure.
  4. Trump is not in charge of the states or the electoral processes.
  5. The USPS unions have endorsed Joe Biden for President.

How Mail-in Voting Can Result in a Constitutional Crisis:

The general consensus of both Mark Levin and Hans von Spakovsky is that the 2020 elections could end up before the Supreme Court Judges. They also agree that the plan of the Democrat party and mainstream media is to put all the blame on President Trump and the USPS but put no blame on the State Governors.

Hans von Spakovsky’s Closing Remarks:

Spakovsky said that looking at the New York primary will show how they (the Democrat party) are going to “game the system“:

  1. They pushed to get as many ballots as possible by mail.
  2. The normal rejection rate of absentee ballots is twice that of ballots cast in precincts.
  3. There is litigation in NY going on now. A judge has ordered election officials to count rejected ballots

“It took New York six weeks to count the ballots. We’ve only got 2 1/2 months to do that between the November election and Inauguration Day. We could have huge delays all over the country. Particularly if there’s litigation going on contesting the results. And you know, there’s been Mark. . . (I couldn’t believe it .) There have been upwards of 150 lawsuits filed this year, an unprecedented number.

Almost all by Liberals trying to change the rules governing elections. Including things (by the way) of trying to do away with the security protocols governing absentee or mail-in ballots. Saying you shouldn’t have to have a witness signature on your ballot and other things like that. So, if you can imagine, litigation going on all over the country after November, big long delays in counting the ballots.

It’s possible that for the first time in our history, we could get to January 20th and not know the outcome of the election because of the litigation going on all over the country. And I’m not sure if a lot of people know this Mark, but there’s actually a federal statute that says that if the outcome of the election has not been determined by January 20th (which is the end of the President’s term), the acting President will become the Speaker of the United States House of Representatives.”

Hans von Spakovsky (The Heritage Foundation) on ‘Life, Liberty & Levin” 8/23/2020

Over to You

Are you concerned that the 2020 elections could result in litigation in the Senate, House of Representatives and ultimately the Supreme Court of the United States of America? Are you worried that this election could turn into a “constitutional mess“?

It’s time to speak up. People who only watch mainstream media are totally unaware of what is going on. We may lose friends over this but it beats losing our freedom.


Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.